<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: ChatGPT Sycophancy Shows the Limits of A/B Testing for AI UX	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.designwhine.com/chatgpt-sycophancy-ab-testing-ai-ux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.designwhine.com/chatgpt-sycophancy-ab-testing-ai-ux/</link>
	<description>Tech Through A Design Lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DesignWhine Editorial Team		</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/chatgpt-sycophancy-ab-testing-ai-ux/#comment-293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 13:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=17314#comment-293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The part product teams should obsess over is not that an A/B test was ‘wrong.’ It measured what it was designed to measure. The deeper problem is deciding which outcomes deserve to become optimisation targets when an AI can be more pleasing and less truthful at the same time.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The part product teams should obsess over is not that an A/B test was ‘wrong.’ It measured what it was designed to measure. The deeper problem is deciding which outcomes deserve to become optimisation targets when an AI can be more pleasing and less truthful at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
