<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Liquid Design and the Myth of Apple’s Great UX	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.designwhine.com/liquid-design-myth-apple-great-ux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.designwhine.com/liquid-design-myth-apple-great-ux/</link>
	<description>Tech Through A Design Lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:59:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DesignWhine Editorial Team		</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/liquid-design-myth-apple-great-ux/#comment-289</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2026 14:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=17294#comment-289</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Apple has earned its design reputation. But does that reputation sometimes stop us applying the same UX standards we would use on everyone else? Liquid Glass, Magic Mouse, Vision Pro, Photos and the butterfly keyboard make an interesting pattern.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple has earned its design reputation. But does that reputation sometimes stop us applying the same UX standards we would use on everyone else? Liquid Glass, Magic Mouse, Vision Pro, Photos and the butterfly keyboard make an interesting pattern.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
