<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Interviews &#8211; DesignWhine</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.designwhine.com/interviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.designwhine.com</link>
	<description>Tech Through A Design Lens</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 11:19:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>The Design System Is Perfect. So Why Is Everyone Working Around It?</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/laura-martinez-design-system-governance-adoption-interview/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/laura-martinez-design-system-governance-adoption-interview/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 17:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=18096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Patternhaus founder Laura Martínez argues that the real test of a design system is not component quality but whether teams can collaborate, make decisions and adopt it without friction. AI makes that distinction more urgent.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/laura-martinez-design-system-governance-adoption-interview/">The Design System Is Perfect. So Why Is Everyone Working Around It?</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/laura-martinez-design-system-governance-adoption-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sangeeta Parakala: Why Human-in-the-Loop AI Can Still Be Powerless</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/sangeeta-parakala-human-agency-ai-oversight/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/sangeeta-parakala-human-agency-ai-oversight/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 10:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=18075</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Sangeeta Parakala draws on healthcare and enterprise design to explain why AI approval steps can leave people powerless, and how risk-based oversight, actionable uncertainty and bounded autonomy can restore meaningful human control.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/sangeeta-parakala-human-agency-ai-oversight/">Sangeeta Parakala: Why Human-in-the-Loop AI Can Still Be Powerless</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/sangeeta-parakala-human-agency-ai-oversight/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catt Small: The Staff Designer’s Real Job Isn’t More Screens</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/catt-small-staff-designer-influence-ai/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/catt-small-staff-designer-influence-ai/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 06:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design Leadership]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=18060</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Catt Small, author of The Staff Designer, explains why senior design leadership depends on judgment, organizational influence and work that rarely appears in a portfolio. Her responses reveal what changes when AI makes execution cheaper.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/catt-small-staff-designer-influence-ai/">Catt Small: The Staff Designer’s Real Job Isn’t More Screens</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/catt-small-staff-designer-influence-ai/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Distance Between Idea and Evidence: Zhengyang Yang on the End-to-End AI Product Designer</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/zhengyang-yang-end-to-end-ai-product-designer-interview/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/zhengyang-yang-end-to-end-ai-product-designer-interview/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 18:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Product & UX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Artificial Intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Figma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Product Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototyping]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=17523</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Zhengyang Yang argues that AI is not creating a lone designer who replaces a product team. It is expanding how far designers can move from an ambiguous idea to working evidence, making judgment, systems thinking and collaboration more important.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/zhengyang-yang-end-to-end-ai-product-designer-interview/">The Distance Between Idea and Evidence: Zhengyang Yang on the End-to-End AI Product Designer</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/zhengyang-yang-end-to-end-ai-product-designer-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Interview Survives: Brendan Jarvis on What AI Still Cannot See</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/brendan-jarvis-ai-user-research-interview/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/brendan-jarvis-ai-user-research-interview/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2026 16:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DesignWhine Magazine Issue #20]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=16900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Brendan Jarvis on synthetic users, AI-moderated research, the danger of plausible findings, and why real interviews may become less routine but more valuable.</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/brendan-jarvis-ai-user-research-interview/">The Interview Survives: Brendan Jarvis on What AI Still Cannot See</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/brendan-jarvis-ai-user-research-interview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Bicycle and the Algorithm: Amber Case on Why AI Has It Backwards</title>
		<link>https://www.designwhine.com/amber-case-interview-why-ai-has-it-backwards/</link>
					<comments>https://www.designwhine.com/amber-case-interview-why-ai-has-it-backwards/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DesignWhine Editorial Team]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI & Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DesignWhine Magazine Issue # 19]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.designwhine.com/?p=15830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>There is a word Amber Case refuses to use. It appears constantly in the vocabulary of technology design right now, on conference slides and in product briefs and in the manifestos of well-meaning startups. The word is &#8220;invisible.&#8221; As in: the best technology is the technology you cannot see. Case, who has spent the better [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com/amber-case-interview-why-ai-has-it-backwards/">The Bicycle and the Algorithm: Amber Case on Why AI Has It Backwards</a> appeared first on <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.designwhine.com">DesignWhine</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.designwhine.com/amber-case-interview-why-ai-has-it-backwards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
